RICK L. KNUTH is the keeper of the Banking and Finance Law Spotlight Site.

Rick's practice focuses on assisting institutional and private lenders and borrowers in asset-based loan transactions, real estate financing, accounts receivable and inventory-based financing. He has over 30 years experience in loan documentation, mortgage and trust deed foreclosures, loan participations, credit opinion letters, workouts, and insolvency proceedings of all kinds. He counsels banks large and small in all aspects of their commercial credit relationships.

Look for postings by the other attorneys in our Commercial Lending and Banking Practice Group.

Keven M. Rowe (Group Leader)
Tom Berggren
Rick L. Knuth
Kyle V. Leishman
James W. Peters
Susan B. Peterson
Jacob Redd
George R. Sutton
Glen D. Watkins
Randon W. Wilson

Published Articles

"Fraudulent Checks- the 'Same Wrongdoer' Defense"
by Rick L. Knuth

Originally Published in Utah Banker Magazine Fall 2013.

Important Resources
Prepayment Penalty? No Such Thing!
Posted on Jul. 16, 2013

The other day a young lawyer in my firm asked: “Does the client want a prepayment penalty in the loan agreement?”

I made him stand the corner and repeat, “There are no prepayment penalties. There are no prepayment penalties.” Over and over.

The law, the maxim goes, abhors a penalty. So, if you’re a lender, please don’t call it that. It’s a “fee, it’s a “premium,”, but it’s never, NEVER, a “penalty.” It is a sum of money that is designed to compensate the lender when the fixed obligation return represented by the loan is interrupted by the early payment. In the absence of a prepayment fee, when the loan is paid off early, the lender not only loses the interest that would have been earned had the loan matured naturally, but now the bank has to redeploy those funds, find another credit-worthy borrower, and underwrite and document a new loan, just to get the return that it anticipated from the loan that has now gone away. What cold heart would think this loss to the bank should not be covered where the borrower repays the loan earlier than agreed?

The prepayment fee should, therefore, be reasonably related to the loss the lender incurs, usually indexed to U.S. Treasury obligations or the LIBOR, for a fixed period of time, to cover the lender’s loss of interest income for a period of time, and for the out-of-pocket costs of employing the funds elsewhere. Remember, if the fee is excessive, then a court may conclude that it’s actually a penalty and strike it down, even though you listened to me and called it a “fee.”


This post was written by attorney Rick L. Knuth

Post Comment:





Rick Knuth is a member of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys.

George Sutton was recognized in 2012 as Utah Attorney of the Year in Financial Services Regulation Law by Best Lawyers in America.

Rick Knuth was recognized in 2012 as Utah Attorney of the Year in Banking and FinanceLaw by Best Lawyers in America.

All eligible attorneys in this group are ranked AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell.

community and industry outreach


Utah Association of Financial Services

  • Associate Member and Convention Sponsor

Utah Banker's Association

  • Convention Sponsor